Tag-Archive for » church lit «

Tuesday, July 14th, 2009 | Author: AggieAtheist

Part 1

Given the whitewashing of Basil Wolverton’s indoctrination materials, for those who can’t stomach the thought of reading through the material again, below the cut I present 87 excerpts, from all six volumes of The Bible Story. Not quite as text-free as Mont’s little money-maker for GCI, one gets more of a sense of the context and thoroughness of the thought-reform engendered by these books, with the captions included. Something “The Wolverton Bible” conveniently left out. Possibly because it would have gotten a “hard R” rating, otherwise.

On books that were distributed to families with pre-school children.

more…

Share/Save/Bookmark

Tuesday, July 14th, 2009 | Author: AggieAtheist

Given the whitewashing of Basil Wolverton’s indoctrination materials, for those who can’t stomach the thought of reading through the material again, below the cut I present 87 excerpts, from all six volumes of The Bible Story. Not quite as text-free as Mont’s little money-maker for GCI, one gets more of a sense of the context and thoroughness of the thought-reform engendered by these books, with the captions included. Something “The Wolverton Bible” conveniently left out. Possibly because it would have gotten a “hard R” rating, otherwise.

On books that were distributed to families with pre-school children.

more…

Share/Save/Bookmark

Monday, July 13th, 2009 | Author: AggieAtheist

So the administrator of the Herbie Worship Archive has either been threatened by Mont or Junior’s Internet Lawyers, or s/h/it has somehow bought into the whitewashing of the church; “The Bible Story” links (which used to redirect to PDF scans of the actual books that we have all held and read, and had read to us, and that impacted the children of the church so irrevocably) all now link to Mont’s little money-maker on his father’s apocalyptic coat-tails.

Junior is probably ecstatic with this arrangement, as it means the whitewashing of the church is nearly complete. As far as Junior’s concerned, any child of the church who protests about the children’s literature we were indoctrinated with, doesn’t have a leg to stand on, because copies of those documents no longer exist, and here, SEND MONEY TO JOE INSTEAD, if you want proof of how you were brainwashed, when you were a kid.

(Would the administrator of the Herbert W. Armstrong Searchable Archive like to step forward, and assure us that none of the other materials are going to be whitewashed in a similar manner? Or at the very least, reveal if Mont and Junior sicced the legal hell-hounds on you.)

Well, well. Surprise, Junior!

Download these while you can, I don’t know how long I’m going to be able to keep them posted before the long arm of GCI retribution snakes out from Pasadena Glendora, and starts threatening me. Unlike Six-Pack Gerry, I can’t afford to put up a fight.

For a little taste of what The Bible Story contains (and if you don’t want/can’t bring yourself to wade through all six volumes of the horror), here is a A Bible Story from Judges, for public edification and childhood flashbacks. Expect another post soon, with some of the pictures and text that DIDN’T get printed, in Mont’s little money-maker for GCI.

Remember, these books were given to children as soon as they were able to read (or were read to pre-school children, by their parents), beginning in 1982-1983. So these stories were read to, or even read by (early reading was encouraged by the church), children between four and six years of age, right up until ten and eleven. By which point, we were starting to graduate out of YES, and beginning to read the “adult” church literature on our own.

Well. If the kid was “truly converted”, that is. :-(

Share/Save/Bookmark

Tuesday, April 28th, 2009 | Author: AggieAtheist

More coo-coo for cocoa puffs from the insane Ted Johnston. (How insane is Teddy?? Teddy makes Weinland look reasonable. What does that tell you?)

If all are included, why is there final judgment and hell?

Of all the evangelical concepts the church had to pay lip service to, in order to get in the good graces of the evangelicals, why did they have to tack hell onto it? Oh, right, that’s what professing Christians use for manipulation and fear-mongering, and they needed something to replace the law-keeping…….But let’s let Teddy speak for himself:

Which is why heaven is a party—the endless wedding reception of the Lamb and his bride—and hell is nothing but the dreariest bar in town.

Bottoms up!

Share/Save/Bookmark

Category: Uncategorized  | Tags: , ,  | Leave a Comment
Thursday, April 23rd, 2009 | Author: AggieAtheist

I have, out of sheer masochistic perversity, been skimming through United’s sermon archive, and I’ve got to say, they have definitely cornered the market, on generating a pocket universe that is as close to pure Armstrongism as it is possible to get, without the pontifical infallibility.

Although I’m sure their Council of Elders has infallible authority up the wazoo. Council of Elders……every time I see that phrase, I think of Lovecraft. :-P

Anyway, I have seen comments here and there on the blog-o-sphere that suggest UCG may be the most “liberal” of the splinters, but I beg to differ, and these sermon transcripts are my proof.

For instance, for those who say UCG acknowledges there are Christians in other churches, this sermon from 2007 vehemently disagrees. (There’s even an off-the-cuff British-Israelism remark thrown in, talking about “our forefathers” in the Old Testament.)

2008 sermon topics included prophecy, more prophecy, and even more prophecy still, for those who contend that United is “moving away from prophecy”.

Add to that mix sermons telling us that “trials sore and great adversities” are actually a blessing, the whole world is deceived, and how to brainwash your children so they are unthinking Armstrongist robots, and I really do have to say, for anyone who is looking for a splinter that is as close to Worldwide as it was during its heyday, United is it.

For all the splinter leaders bleating that their splinter is the one true splinter, UCG definitely has cornered the market, in the look, sound, and feel, of “god’s true church”.

The question I ask is, whatever would posses you to think that this is a good thing??

Share/Save/Bookmark

Category: Uncategorized  | Tags: , ,  | 4 Comments
Wednesday, April 15th, 2009 | Author: AggieAtheist

More horrifying anti-Semitism and British-Israelism, courtesy Vol. VI of Basil Wolverton’s “The Bible Story”. These books were distributed to families with children of reading age or even younger, and children were expected to be reading these six volumes of “bible stories” even before they started on their YES lessons, and then later in conjunction with the YES lessons. You will also note the blatant proof-texting throughout the narrative.

Before you ask, yes, we were supposed to look up the verses scattered throughout the text. The first verse given here, establishes pretty much what the church wanted to instill, into its children. The nature of the proof-texting also gives an insight to the “bible jigsaw” ideology we were taught, i.e., not reading the verses in context, but reassembling the verses of the Old Testament, so that they aligned (however poorly) with the church’s theology. This is made quite clear in the following passages, as you will note the cohesive narrative literally jumps all over the old testament NKJV, to make its point, and omits at least one key verse, discussed below.

Also, throughout the narrative, “the Israelites” refers to the northern kingdom, as Vol. 5 of TBS had already dealt with “the civil war” between “Israel” and “Judah”, that resulted in “the two kingdoms” British-Israelism racism relies upon. It was also implicitly understood that, throughout the text reprinted below, “Assyrians” was synonymous with “Germany”, as per British-Israelism.

The Almost-Lost Ten Tribes

The occupants of Samaria expected to be slaughtered, and many were, as God had warned. (Hosea 13:16.) But the total annihilation wasn’t part of the Assyrians’ plan, which had to do with the value of slaves. The Israelites were rounded up like so many cattle, along with others from other towns and villages of the ten tribes, and forced to march to Assyria with the victors. (II Kings 17:6, 18:11.) Later, Assyrians returned to herd more thousands of Israelites, scattered throughout the countryside, out of their land.

Thus, two hundred fifty-three years after the twelve tribes had divided into the two kingdoms of Israel and Judah, the kingdom of Israel abruptly ceased to exist. The people had again and again rejected God’s rules for the best way of living and had turned to idolatry. (Judges 2:11-13; Psalms 106:34-41; 78:56-66.) God had repeatedly warned them, through priests and prophets, what would happen if they continued in idolatry. (II Kings 17:7-13; Jeremiah 7:24-26.) But most of the Israelites wouldn’t heed. (Daniel 9:6.)

Now, at last, the Israelites were dragged away from their homes and into slavery in foreign lands even beyond Assyria. (II Kings 17:18; 20-23; 18:11-12.) God had long been patient. (Psalms 78:25-41; 86:15.) But at last His patience gave way to anger because this part of the people He had chosen to be the greatest of nations had broken their promise to the Creator to keep His commandments. (Exodus 19:6; 24:7; Joshua 24:20-22; II Kings 17:14-17.)

Scattered across hundres of miles of territory and mingling with people of heathen nations, and later wandering through many lands, the people of Israel eventually lost their identity as Israelites and Sabbath observers, and in time came to be regarded by others as Gentiles. What had once been a great nation was swallowed up, to be known for a very long time only as the “Lost Ten Tribes.”

Is it so? Hmmm, you will note that both II Kings 17:7-18 and II Kings 17:20-23 are mentioned. The northern kingdom of “Israelites” were spirited away by the Assyrians, because they had fallen into idolatry, while the southern kingdom of “Judah” (our modern-day Jews, or so we were taught) were spared this ignominy because they were still Sabbath-keepers.

This is the entire cornerstone of British-Israelism theory.

Do you see anything missing from those two citations? How about this?

II Kings 17:19:
Also Judah did not keep the commandments of the LORD their God, but walked in the statutes of Israel which they made.

Proof-texting, demonstrated so ably, by this passage from Basil Wolverton. Thanks, Basil!

Share/Save/Bookmark

Category: Uncategorized  | Tags:  | 9 Comments
Tuesday, April 07th, 2009 | Author: AggieAtheist

Who needs the TARDIS? Behold, life as it was lived in the parallel universe of the church:

Pastor General’s Report
To the Ministry of the Worldwide Church of God

VOL. 5, NO. 8                             PASADENA, CALIFORNIA                      FEBRUARY 25, 1983

FROM MINISTERIAL SERVICES

Guidelines for the Night to be Much Observed

As a reminder, the “Night to be Much Observed” should be held in family groups in private homes. Proper planning and preparation should be made to see to it that everyone,  including all elderly and singles, will have a place to go to be with the brethren on this very important occasion. We reprint once again the following quote from a pastoral letter of April 8, 1970 giving Mr. Armstrong’s last officical statement on the subject:

Mr. Herbert Armstrong had intended to write you all a note re-garding how to conduct the “Night to be Much Observed.” However…he has been extremely busy and unable to…..So he told me to go ahead and tell you that he has now decided that there should not be any type of service or Bible study on that evening with the new format we will now be using.

He said to simply tell the brethren to have two or three families eat and fellowship together on that evening in an attitude of thankfulness and rejoicing for the deliverance from sin which we as New Testament Christians experience. The host or leading man should ask God’s blessing on the meal and the occasion but no further “sermonizing” will be necessary or helpful since the brethren will be meeting, for the most part, without an ordained minister present.

You ministers be sure to explain carefully the Sabbath before the meaning of this night of rejoicing and then tell the brethren to bear that in mind as the background and focus of the spiritual fellowship through that particular evening. But we feel it is better NOT to give them an outline of some kind of service…they will all get to hear from God’s ministers twice on the very next day , the Holy Day, anyway. So, no Bible study or sermonizing is necessary on the previous evening. It will merely be your responsibility to appoint elders and deacons to check with the brethren and be sure that the widows and other single people are included in the dinner and fellowship with one or more families so that no one is left out of the fine feast and fellowship on this night which pictures Israel’s thankfulness and rejoicing in coming out of Egypt and our deliverance from sin.

In addition, be sure to remind the brethren to plan well in advance for this entire Holy Day season so that they won’t have last-minute hardships due to unforeseen meal needs on the first Holy Day. There should be two services on that day as on all Holy Days except Atonement.

So that’s how it was a long time ago, in a universe far, far away.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Category: Uncategorized  | Tags: ,  | 28 Comments
Tuesday, March 31st, 2009 | Author: AggieAtheist

Been waiting a while for these to hit YouTube. I offer no commentary, save that the salient points can be gathered from the first two and a half minutes of the following:

Edit: Check out the kids in part 2:

One more, that’s it, I promise.

I remember exactly where I was sitting, when I saw the following:

For any interested passersby, if there are any, these are films that were shown behind locked doors, to anywhere between three and five thousand church members per site, at the Feast of Tabernacles. None of this footage was made public, and you can see the sharp contrast between these films, and the “publicly” aired telecast of The World Tomorrow. Too, we accepted everything in these films as the absolute way the church was, and was always going to be, since we self-policed from getting involved with “the world”.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Category: Uncategorized  | Tags: ,  | 16 Comments
Wednesday, March 11th, 2009 | Author: AggieAtheist

I’ve updated my Essential Posts page, and included links to “We are the Children of the Church” series as well.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Sunday, February 22nd, 2009 | Author: AggieAtheist

It’s like The Godfather. I’ve been trying to get out, but they keep on pullin’ me back in!!!

I have been trying to pursue my non-ex-CoG-interests that I had, prior to starting my mental exit from the church (as opposed to my physical exit, which was almost a decade-and-a-half ago), and to that end, I’ve been picking up the thread that has run through my entire life, science fiction. First I found that William Gibson quote, and it related to the Evolution-Creation CageMatch on AW (that seems to have thankfully wound down for the moment), and then I was catching up on some Neil Gaiman interviews, and I found this:

Q. Have you personally ever had any of your work censored?

A. Yes. I once when I was young nearly sent a Swedish publisher to jail for a bible story. I was involved in a comic called Outrageous Tales from the Old Testament where we retold, with a straight face, stories from the Old Testament. I told a story from the book of Judges, in which a man’s wife is to quote the bible “whoring about on him.” And he sent her away and then he goes and gets her back from her father. He misses her. They stop off in this little village over night. The townsfolk gather around on the road to Bethlehem, which is where they are and say, “That man that came to you tonight. Throw him out so that we may have sex with him. We want to rape him.” And this man says “No. No. No. I will not. That would be a terrible thing. That would be a violation of all the laws of hospitality. And he’s my guest. But I’ll tell you what. He has a wife with him and I have a virgin daughter whose never known any man. You can have them.” They get known and abused all night and are left dead on the doorstep the next morning. When the guy gets up the morning he finds his wife dead on the doorstep and takes her home and cuts her into thirteen bits and into twelve locks and sends one to each of the tribes of Israel. So I told that story and did it fairly straight, and next thing I knew I had a Swedish publisher about to go to jail because there is a Swedish law forbidding the depiction of images of violence against women. That particular bible story is filled with images of violence against women. I think it was more or less only the fact that it was from the bible and told completely straight that got him off.

Um. He cut her into twelve bits, actually, and I only know this because I read it in The Bible Story. When I was nine. The following text and illustrations are taken from The Bible Story Vol. III, written and illustrated by Basil Wolverton. And remember, when you read the following narrative, that it is an allegory for the world we were living in, as children of the church: The Levite represented the Levitical priesthood we were beholden to, in the WCG, and we were like the elderly Ephraimite. (I literally was like the elderly Ephraimite, being from an Ephraimite colony at the time.)

The “New Morality”

In that era when Israel was without a national leader, with everyone generally doing as he pleased as long as he could get away with it, another episode occurred that brought tragedy. Misery and death came to thousands because they were living apart from their Creator. This event started near Mt. Ephraim, where another Levite lived with his common-law wife. They believed in the “New Morality” of that day. They, like so many couples throughout history, lived in sin. They didn’t obey God’s laws that would bring family happiness. The woman then began to live with other men. Later she left to return to the home of her parents in the town of Bethlehem in the land of the tribe of Judah. (Judges 19:1-2)

After she had been gone four months, the man decided he couldn’t get along any longer without her — and hoped she would now be ready to come home. He and a servant set out on burros for Bethlehem, about twenty miles to the southwest. When they neared the home of the woman’s parents, the man was pleasantly surprised to see his common-law wife coming out of the house and happily rushing out to meet him.

“I am sorry I left you,” she told him, “and I am glad you came after me. I should be pleased to return with you to Mt. Ephraim!”

She led him into the home of her parents, who welcomed him cordially. In fact, because they were happy to see him and because they wanted their daughter to stay with him as long as possible, they kept the couple as guests for three days.

On the fourth day the Levite intended to leave for home, but the father-in-law prevailed on him to stay a few more hours. Time slipped by, and then it was too late to set out. (Judges 19:3-7.)

On the fifth day, the couple prepared to leave early, but again the woman’s parents treated them so well with food, drink, and pleasant conversation that they were delayed into the late afternoon.

“Why start out at this hour?” the Levite’s father-in-law asked. “You can’t get very far before dark. It would be wiser to stay here one more night and plan to start out in the morning. Meanwhile, relax, and enjoy yourselves.”

“No, we must start out this afternoon,” the Levite said, realizing that if he continued to give in, they would never get home.

The woman’s parents knew they had kept their daughter as long as possible.

Tearfully they saw the couple off on their trip northward.

By the time the Levite, his common-law wife (called a “concubine” in the Bible), a servant and two burros reached Jerusalem, about four miles away, it was almost sundown. (Judges 19:8-10.)

“I suggest we stop here for the night, sir,” the servant remarked. “If we travel after dark, we’ll risk being robbed.”

“I don’t prefer to stay here in Jerusalem,” the Levite said. “The people here are Canaanites, and I don’t trust them. It is better to spend the night among our own people. I would rather go on to Gibeah or Ramah where the people are Israelites.”

It was about two and one-half more miles to the Benjamite city of Gibeah. The sun went down just before they got there. (Judges 19:11-15.) They sat down in a prominent place to wait for someone to invite them into his home for the night, since a small town like Gibeah probably didn’t have an inn. Soon an elderly Ephraimite, returning home late from working in the fields, walked up to the little group.

“You look like strangers here,” the old man said to them. “Where have you come from and where are you going?”

The Levite explained that he and his concubine and servant were travelling from Bethlehem to the Tabernacle  at Shiloh. He mentioned that they had plenty of food and wine for themselves and feed for the animals, but no place to sleep. (Judges 19:16-19.)

Is Anyone Safe?

“Ah, but you’re welcome at my home!” the old man declared enthusiastically, motioning them to follow him. “And I have plenty of food for all, and provender for your burros, so keep what you have. Otherwise you might run short. Come! Let’s get off the street. It isn’t safe here at night!”

Later, when all of them were comfortably eating and conversing in the old man’s house, there was a loud rapping on the door. The host opened it, only to be jerked outside by a group of mean-looking young men.

“We know that you have a stranger in your house!” one of them growled menacingly. “Send him out here at once to us, or you’ll be in for plenty of trouble! And don’t tell him anything! Just get him out here!”

basiljudges

CHAPTER SEVENTY-THREE

THE “NEW MORALITY”

The old man, who had invited the three strangers to spend the night at his home in Gibeah, was pulled outside by hoodlums. They demanded that he send out his Levite guest. The old fellow shook his head in fear and disbelief when he realized what these vile men wanted to do. (Judges 19:16-22.)

Willing to Compromise

“Please go away and leave us alone!” he pleaded. “This Levite is my guest along with his wife and servant! It would be a terrible disgrace to let anything happen to him at my home. Surely you can find your pleasure elsewhere!”

The old man was very concerned about his reputation. But he was much less concerned about the drift into the decaying morality of that time.

“Do as we say,” the men growled, closing in more tightly around him, “or you’ll never get back into your house!”

The elderly Ephraimite was sure that by now the man they wanted probably had heard the unfriendly voices, and wouldn’t come out under any circumstance. In a frantic attempt to escape from this nightmare situation, the old man was moved to make a miserable suggestion. To save his male guest — and his own reputation as a host — he self-righteously stooped to an unthinkable compromise.

“Look, fellows,” he begged. “Don’t consider such a terrible perversion. I have a young daughter inside! We’ll send her and my guest’s wife out to you to do with as you please if you’ll only forget about the man!” (Judges 19:23-24.) The miserable old man thought men were more important and more worthy of protection than women. He reasoned that what he was suggesting was a lesser perversion and would be less sinful.

“We don’t care about the women!” was the angry reply.

Sick with fear, the old man ambled back into the house. Hesitantly he whispered the situation to his guest, who turned pale at what he heard. Like his host, his frenzied mind quickly sought a wretched way of escape. As a Levite from the tabernacle at Shiloh, he especially should have trusted God for His promised deliverance. (Leviticus 26:3, 6; Deuteronomy 4:3120:4; 31:6.)

“Don’t let them in!” the Levite muttered cravenly, seizing his common-law wife. To save himself, he was ready to do anything — even sacrifice the woman he should have been protecting.

He hauled the surprised woman up to the door, yanked it open, and thrust her outside. (Judges 19:25.) Quickly he closed and bolted door, hoping the mob would be more gentle with her than depraved mobs usually are. It happened so suddenly that the poor woman hardly knew what was happening until she found herself being stared at by the depraved men waiting outside. She wheeled around to get back into the house, pounding feverishly on the door. The men stared lustfully at her, noting for the first time that she was unusually attractive.

“Let’s take her and forget about the man for now!” one of them suggested.

The others nodded in agreement. The frightened, struggling woman was dragged away. Though she repeatedly screamed for help, there was no one to even try to rescue her. The men who should have protected her were hiding behind locked doors, completely lacking in the compassion and courage they should have displayed under the circumstances. Theirs was the corrupt type of character that prevailed in a time when Israel was far from God.

Hours later, just before sunrise, the woman came staggering up to the house and fell down at the door. (Judges 19:26.) In the meantime, her cowardly common-law husband was preparing to leave without her. He didn’t know where she was, but he was afraid to look for her lest he run into trouble with the depraved men who had taken her.

On opening the door to leave, he was surprised to find her lying there face down. His conscience stung him because of the cowardly, brutal way he had acted. But instead of helping her up, he chose to assert himself as her master, even in the face of her pitiable circumstance.

“Get up woman!” he barked. “I want to get going for home right away!”

There was no answer or movement. The man motioned for his servant to help the woman up. The servant tried to get her to her feet. It was then that they discovered she was dead.

basiljudges2

A Desperate Plan

Without a word the Levite lifted the body onto one of his burros and started for home. (Judges 19:27-28.) On the way he had plenty of opportunity to consider how cruel and cowardly he had been. He regretted his terrible conduct, but at the same time he hoped he could place the blame for his common-law wife’s death elsewhere. The more he thought about the depraved Benjamites, the more he considered their guilt and the less he considered his. By the time he arrived home, his anger and desire for revenge had grown to such an extent that he conceived a gruesome plan.

The first thing he did was compose twelve copies of this message, a copy to be sent to each of the twelve tribes of Israel:

“My wife was lately seized by Benjamites in their city of Gibeah. She died because of their brutal advances. I am sending proof of her death. I ask that something be done to execute vengeance on the foul men who are responsible.”

The Levite immediately sent the letter to all parts of Israel by swift carriers. Wherever it arrived it was startlingly effective, but not just because of the words. With each message the angry Levite included a piece of his wife’s body, having cut her up into twelve parts!

basiljudges3

The story continues on from there, this incident being the catalyst for the civil war between the two kingdoms, that resulted in ten of the tribes being “lost”, i.e., captured by Assyria (Germany), and that segues nicely into British-Israelism, always an important concept to pound into the kiddies’ heads early. :roll:

Something tells me Neil Gaiman’s version was better……

(Moral of the story: Never piss off a minister.)

Share/Save/Bookmark

Category: Uncategorized  | Tags: ,  | 8 Comments